Tag Archives: European Union

by | 04 Mar 2010 · 21:20

EU-Morocco Summit Meeting

The first post-Lisbon Treaty summit meeting between the EU and another country will take place 6 and 7 March in Granada between the EU and Morocco.

Among the topics of discussion will be immigration and the Union for the Mediterranean.  Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Miguel Ángel Moratinos, said  “…we will discuss immigration issues, which are very important. Morocco is a partner that assists European countries and source countries enormously to manage migratory flows co-responsibly, and it is therefore a key country for the strong and effective management of these flows….”

Click here and here for Spanish EU Presidency statements and here for an article (en francais).

Leave a comment

Filed under Eastern Atlantic, European Union, Mediterranean, Morocco, News, Spain

Tagged as , , ,

by | 02 Mar 2010 · 20:49

NGO Statement on Europe for UNHCR’s 47th Standing Committee Meeting

From the ICVA – International Council of Voluntary Agencies.   Excerpts from the NGO Statement:

“Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme

Standing Committee, 47th Meeting, 2-4 March 2010

NGO Statement on Europe

Agenda Item 3. (a) iii

This statement has been drafted in consultation with, and is delivered on behalf of, a wide range of NGOs and attempts to reflect the diversity of views within the NGO community.

[***] If we look at the asylum policies of the European Union (EU) and neighbouring countries, we detect a hesitation or shift away from the spirit of the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol.

In this statement, NGOs would like to draw attention to this trend in three policy areas. These are:

  • The limits on access to refugee protection in Europe;
  • The integration of refugees in European society; and
  • The externalisation of refugee protection.  [***]

Limits on Access to Protection in Europe

Access to territory

[***] EU border policies continue to be obsessed with security and combating irregular migration at the expense of providing access to those in need of international protection. There is now no legal way for an asylum-seeker to enter the EU. NGOs urges the Member States to collaborate with the European Commission, Parliament, Frontex, and the newly established European Asylum Support Office in developing guidelines on identifying those in need of international protection in mixed flows. UNHCR should be closely consulted in this process. [***]

Externalisation of Refugee Protection

[***] The Stockholm Programme raises the issue of external processing of asylum claims in transit countries. Careful consideration must be given to the potential role of UNHCR in joint processing and the responsibility of European countries in resettling those identified as in need of international protection. It should not be assumed that identified refugees will remain in the transit country. There remains significant concern from European NGOs regarding the legal, practical, and moral implications of such external processing if these trends continue.

Bilateral agreements, such as those between Spain and the West African countries of Senegal and Mauritania, do firmly place the burden of hosting refugees with the transit country. This trend is also visible in the agreements between Italy and Libya and the pushbacks in the Mediterranean.

What we can discern from these trends and those above, is that European policies favour refugees remaining in neighbouring regions rather than facilitating their access to Europe. These trends can only be met with condemnation as an obvious breach of human rights and States’ obligations. [***]

Closing Remark

Given the current negative trends in European refugee policies, it is important to look at initiatives that move in the opposite direction. NGOs are greatly supportive of the call in the Stockholm Programme for the EU to seek accession to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. This is made possible through the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty that gives the EU a legal personality. As such, we look forward to the different agencies of the EU, including Frontex and European Asylum Support Office, seeking guidance from and collaborating with the UNHCR. [***]”

Click here for full Statement.

Click here for link to other related documents on ICVA web site.

Leave a comment

Filed under European Union, Frontex, Statements, UNHCR

Tagged as , , ,

by | 02 Mar 2010 · 05:09

Informal Meeting of European Union Defence Ministers

An Informal Meeting of EU Defence Ministers was held in Mallorca last week to discuss the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) established by the Treaty of Lisbon.

A decision was taken at the meeting to expand the objectives of Operation Atalanta to include the surveillance and control of Somali ports where pirate ships are based.  This decision will be implemented later in the month of March as weather conditions in the region improve.  The decision represents a potentially significant expansion of the EU’s anti-piracy operations.

Also attending the Informal Meeting were the ministers of defence from Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Mauritania and Tunisia.  A side meeting was conducted with regard to improving co-operation in matters of security in the Euro-Mediterranean zone.  The side talks pertained to the so-called “5+5 Western Mediterranean Defence Initiative” or more simply the “5 + 5 Initiative”.

Spanish Minister of Defence, Carme Chacón, who chaired the Informal Meeting said in regard to the meetings with the defence ministers from the five Maghreb countries:

“Spain is very clear on the fact that the Mediterranean is a sea of opportunities, but if we let our guard down then it can become a sea of problems – and we share this vision with all the associations we are involved in. At the moment it is a sea of peace and tranquillity, but both North and South must work together to tackle the dangers and new threats of the 21st Century, such as international terrorism, drug smuggling and organised crime. We must put our surveillance and maritime safety capacities into action in order to combat these threats, which could become an area of concern or a problem if we do not deal with them properly. And Spain will not forget this. In terms of the initiative of bringing together the countries of Europe and the Maghreb, we would like it to be not just the Spanish Presidency that sees to hold these meetings, but for the EU to be able to sit down regularly with these countries to discuss issues relating to the Mediterranean Sea, which must carry on being a source of opportunities rather than one of concern.”

Click here, here, here, and here for Press Releases from the Informal Meeting.

Cliquez ici pour un article (blog post) en francais.

Leave a comment

Filed under Algeria, European Union, Gulf of Aden, Indian Ocean, Libya, Mauritania, Mediterranean, Morocco, News, Somalia, Spain, Tunisia

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , ,

by | 16 Feb 2010 · 04:53

New Statewatch Report: NeoConOpticon- The EU Security-Industrial Complex

Statewatch and the Transnational Institute have published a comprehensive new report.

The report, “NeoConOpticon, The EU Security-Industrial Complex”, is a “follow-up [to Arming Big Brother, 2006] [and] contains new research showing how the European Security Research Programme [ESRP] continues to be shaped by prominent transnational defence and security corporations and other vested interests. Though technically a Research and Development (R&D) programme, the ESRP is heavily focused on the application of security technologies (rather than objective research per se), and is increasingly aligned with EU policy in the fields of justice and home affairs (JHA, the ‘third pillar’), security and external defence (CFSP, the ‘second pillar’).”

The Report includes a discussion of maritime immigration enforcement.  Excerpt:

“Having fortified many of the traditional entry points to Europe, the focus of the ‘war on migration’ has shifted to the islands of the Mediterranean and the coastlines of Africa and the Middle East. For FRONTEX, the newly created EU border management agency, this ‘southern maritime frontier’ is the ‘first line of defence’ of ‘Europe’s borders’. Since 2003 FRONTEX has coordinated a host of joint police and naval missions to combat ‘illegal’ immigration by sea and is now in the process of setting up a permanent European Patrols Network for the Mediterranean and a corps of Rapid Border Intervention Teams (RABITs) for deployment to ‘illegal immigration hotspots’.

This militarised approach to immigration control is part of a broader EU maritime security and defence strategy. In 2005, following the lead of the USA’s ‘SeaPower21’ strategy, the Chiefs of European Navies (CHENS) launched a 20-year ‘Vision for the Future Role of European Maritime Forces’ to meet the demands of the European Security Strategy (2003) and enhanced NATO Maritime Joint Operations. The rationale behind the CHENS strategy is that the sea: ‘has already been used for terror attacks by boats armed with rockets and small arms’ and ‘for logistic support to terrorism’. The sea is also a potential conduit for CBRN material and “criminal activity including narcotics, human trafficking and piracy’, all of which is ‘increasing in sophistication and volume.’ …”

Click here for Executive Summary.

Click here for full report.

Leave a comment

Filed under Eastern Atlantic, European Union, Frontex, Mediterranean, Reports

Tagged as , , , ,

by | 12 Feb 2010 · 05:38

Presentation Materials from EU Conference on “Maritime Policies for a Prosperous and Secure Europe”

The Spanish EU Presidency conducted a conference on “MARITIME POLICIES FOR A PROSPEROUS AND SECURE EUROPE – Towards a Comprehensive 21st-Century Civil-Military Approach” in January 2010 during which multiple presentations were given by representatives from Frontex, military representatives, and others.

The PowerPoint presentations used by some of the presenters are posted on the internet (See http://www.eutrio.eu/export/sites/presidencia/comun/descargas/ [xxx] )

Links to two of the presentations are provided here.

“European Border Surveillance”, Erik Berglund, Director of Capacity Building, Frontex.

Click here.

“Integration of Maritime Surveillance Systems as a Keystone for Maritime Security”, Bg. Gen. José María Orea Malo, Head Operations Division Spanish Air Force Staff.

Click here.

Leave a comment

Filed under European Union, Frontex, Spain

Tagged as , , ,

by | 10 Feb 2010 · 17:05

Cecilia Malmström: New EC Commissioner for Justice & Home Affairs

After an 8 month delay, the European Parliament has approved a new term for European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso and his 26 commissioners.

The new Commissioner with responsibility for Justice and Home Affairs is Cecilia Malmström.

Click here for link to the Commissioner’s new web site.

Click here for article about the Commissioner’s hearing before the EP.

Click here for article about the EP vote.

Leave a comment

Filed under European Union, News, Sweden

Tagged as , , ,

by | 05 Feb 2010 · 05:27

Background Note Pertaining to Proposed Guidelines for Frontex Operations at Sea

Given the strong objections by Malta and Italy to the proposed Guidelines for Frontex Operations at Sea, the “Note for the File” pertaining to the “Draft Council Decision supplementing the Schengen Borders Code as regards sea border surveillance in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by FRONTEX (COM(2009)658) as amended by the Council on 25 January 2010” is worth reading.

The “Note” explains the origins of the Guidelines and the additional procedures which will need to be completed before the Guidelines take effect:

“Note for the File:

The questions of who is responsible for saving people at sea and where they should be disembarked have been subject to intense debates in the context of surveillance operations concerning the EU’s sea borders coordinated by Frontex. The operations take place in a highly complex legal and political environment and touch upon international law issues and on the EU’s relations with third countries.

After long preparatory work, including a study on the relevant international law instruments completed in 2007, the Commission drafted a set of guidelines intended to

  • ensure that international rules are uniformly applied by all Member States taking part in surveillance operations coordinated by Frontex (Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), conventions on safety at sea and search and rescue, international law on refugees and fundamental rights) and
  • create a basis in EU law enabling one Member State to carry out surveillance of another Member States’ maritime borders.

The Commission presented the draft guidelines in the form of an implementing measure, based on Article 12 (5) of the Schengen Borders Code.  This provision, together with Article 33 of the Borders Code, authorises the Commission to adopt additional measures governing border surveillance in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny as laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC (“comitology decision”).

After the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon this procedure continues to apply until the basic legal act, the Schengen Borders Code, has been aligned to the framework of the Treaty of Lisbon. Therefore, the regulatory procedure with scrutiny applies to the present draft measure.

The draft was first submitted to the Borders Code Committee. Member States’ experts failed to agree on the draft; therefore, the Committee did not issue a formal opinion. One of the controversial issues was whether the Commission’s draft went beyond its implementing powers.

On 7 December 2009, the Commission submitted a revised draft to the Council and to the Parliament, in the form of a draft Council Decision (COM(2009)658).

In accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny the Council, acting by qualified majority, had the following options:

  • · oppose the proposed measure, in which case it will not be adopted; the Commission may submit an amended proposal or present a legislative proposal (option 1)
  • · envisage adopting the proposed measure, in which case it shall without delay submit it to the European Parliament (option 2)
  • · not act within the two months, in which case the Commission shall without delay submit the measures to the Parliament.

The Council had to act within a deadline of two months, i.e. before 7 February 2010.  On 25 January 2010 the Council, with Italy and Malta abstaining, decided to envisage adopting draft Council Decision and submit the draft Council Decision to the European Parliament. Furthermore, the Council agreed on an additional declaration to be adopted by the Council if Parliament does not oppose the measure, asking Frontex to report on the practical implementation of this decision.

European Parliament’s role in the procedure and deadline

In accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, Parliament has four months in total, starting from the date of referral on 7 December 2009, to scrutinise the draft measure. In practice, Parliament now has two more months to take position before 7 April 2010.

Parliament’s options in the regulatory procedure with scrutiny are limited to the following. Parliament may, acting by a majority of its component Members,

  • · oppose the adoption of the measure; in this case, Parliament must justify its opposition, stating that the proposed measure exceeds the implementing powers granted to the Commission in the basic instrument, or is not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality; if Parliament opposes, the draft measure shall not be adopted; the Commission may submit an amended proposal or present a legislative proposal
  • · not oppose the adoption of the draft measure; in this case, the draft measure may be adopted by the Council or the Commission.

LIBE, as the committee responsible, will prepare Parliament’s position, in accordance with Rule 88 of the Rules of Procedure. The Member responsible in LIBE is Michael Cashman, rapporteur for the basic act, the Schengen Borders Code. Once the Council’s position, adopted on 25 February 2010, has been officially referred to the Parliament, the chairman will set a deadline for Members who wish to propose that the committee objects to the draft measure. If the committee decides to object, it shall table a motion for a resolution to the plenary for adoption before 7 April 2010.

Action undertaken by LIBE so far:

On 11 January 2010, LIBE, as the committee responsible, heard presentations of the Commission (Mr Henrik Nielsen, Head of Unit, DG JLS) and the Spanish Presidency (Mr Burgos Nieto, JHA Counsellor) and held a first exchange of views on the file.

During the debate, several Members highlighted the political importance of the decision on the guidelines (Mr Busuttil, Mrs Flautre, Mr Moraes, Mrs Hennis-Plasschaert) and the fact that this was a long-standing discussion in the Council. The Executive Director of Frontex (Mr Laitinen) underlined the swift adoption of guidelines would enhance the efficiency of Frontex’ operations.

Next steps:

The Council will refer its position, which was adopted on 25 January 2010, to the Parliament within a few days. Then it will be Parliament’s turn to take a position before the expiry of the deadline on 7 April 2010.

In order to prepare LIBE’s position, the rapporteur recommends that an opinion be requested from the Parliament’s legal service, which should answer the following questions:

1)

a) Having regard to the delineation between “rules” and “guidelines” for Member States in the draft measure as amended by the Council, could the content be considered a “non-essential element” of the final legal framework shaping the role of the Member States and Frontex?

b) Has the Commission exceeded its implementing powers under Article 12 (5) of the Schengen Borders Code by proposing the present draft measure?

2) In case the content or a part of the content of the draft measure touches upon essential elements of the basic act, could the objectives of the measure be achieved by a legislative act, notably by amending the basic act, i.e. the Schengen Borders Code?

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION:

Documents:

  • · Proposal for a Council Decision supplementing the Schengen Borders Code as regards the surveillance of the sea external borders in the context of the operational cooperation coordinated by Frontex, COM(2009)658 of 27.11.2009, as amended by the Council on 25 January 2010
  • · Commission staff working document, Study on the international law instruments in relation to illegal immigration by sea, SEC (2007)691 of 15.5.2007, available in EN and FR.

Contacts:

European Parliament:

Member responsible: Michael CASHMAN

Asisstant to Mr Cashman: Renaud-Raphaël Savignat, tel. – 47759

S&D political Advisor: Mrs Annie Lemarchal, tel. – 43057

Desk officer responsible in the LIBE Secretariat: Lotte Madlen Tittor, tel. -40785

European Commission:

Desk officer responsible in DG JLS: Ana Isabel Sanchez Ruiz, tel. 02-2998239, email: Ana-Isabel.Sanchez-Ruiz@ec.europa.eu

Head of the responsible Unit in DG JLS: Henrik Nielsen, tel. 02-2991641, email: Henrik.Nielsen@ec.europa.eu

Council General Secretariat:

Desk officer: Mr Bent Mejborn, tel. 02-2816722, email: bent.mejborn@consilium.europa.eu

Spanish Presidency:

Mr Eugenio Burgos Nieto, JHA Counsellor, email: eugenio.burgos@reper.maec.es”

Click here for link to Document.

1 Comment

Filed under Analysis, European Union, Frontex, Italy, Malta, Mediterranean

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | 05 Feb 2010 · 04:51

Guidelines for Frontex Operations at Sea

NB –I believe this document is the final version of the proposed guidelines approved by the Council on 25 January 2010, with Italy and Malta abstaining, and which has now been forwarded to the Parliament for scrutiny.  I will remove or amend this post if I discover this is not the final version approved by the Council.

What follows are relevant excerpts from Document COM(2009)658 (Brussels, 27.11.2009), the final Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION supplementing the Schengen Borders Code as regards the surveillance of the sea external borders in the context of the operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders – Frontex.

As noted, Malta and Italy oppose these guidelines and have threatened to withdraw from future Frontex missions if these guidelines take effect.

Guidelines for Frontex operations at sea

1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

1.1 Measures taken for the purpose of the surveillance operation should be conducted in a way that does not put at risk the safety of the persons intercepted or rescued as well as of the participating units.

1.2. The special needs of children, victims of trafficking, persons in need of urgent medical assistance, persons in need of international protection and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation should be considered throughout all the operation.

1.3. These guidelines should be applied by Member States in accordance with fundamental rights. Member States should ensure that border guards participating in the surveillance operation are trained with regard to relevant provisions of human rights and refugee law, and are familiar with the international regime on search and rescue.

2. INTERCEPTION

2.1 Upon detection, the ship or other sea craft (“ship”) should be approached in order to observe its identity and nationality and, pending further measures, should be surveyed at a prudent distance. [***]

2.4. Measures taken in the course of the surveillance operation against ships or other sea craft with regard to which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that they carry persons intending to circumvent the checks at border crossing points may include: [***]

(f) conducting the ship or persons on board to a third country or otherwise handing over the ship or persons on board to the authorities of a third country;

(g) conducting the ship or persons on board to the host Member State or to another Member State participating in the operation.

3. SEARCH AND RESCUE SITUATIONS ARISING IN THE COURSE OF THE OPERATION

3.1. Participating units shall provide assistance to any vessel or person in distress at sea. They shall do so regardless of the nationality or status of such a person or the circumstances in which that person is found.

3.2. When facing in the course of the operation a situation in which uncertainty or apprehension exists as to the safety of a ship or of any person on board, the participating unit should forward as soon as possible all available information to the Rescue Coordination Centre responsible for the search and rescue region where the situation is taking place.

In cases where the Rescue Coordination Centre of the third country responsible for the search and rescue region does not respond to the notification transmitted by the participating unit, the latter should contact the Rescue Coordination Centre of the host Member State that is geographically the closest to the emergency.

While awaiting instructions from the Rescue Coordination Centre, participating units should take all the appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the persons concerned. [***].

4. DISEMBARKATION

4.1. The operational plan should spell out the modalities for the disembarkation of the persons intercepted or rescued, in accordance with international law and any applicable bilateral agreements.

Subject to section 4.2, priority should be given to disembarkation in the third country from where the persons departed or through the territorial waters or search and rescue region of which the persons transited or, if this is not possible, to disembarkation in the geographically closest place where the safety of the persons can be ensured.

4.2. No person should be disembarked in or otherwise handed over to the authorities of a country with regard to which there are substantial grounds for believing that he or she would be subjected to persecution or to torture or to other forms of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or from which there is a risk of expulsion or return towards such a country. The persons intercepted or rescued must be informed in an appropriate way so that they can express any reasons for believing that they would be subject to such treatment in the proposed place of disembarkation.

4.3. The coordination centre should be informed of the presence of persons within the meaning of paragraph 4.2, and should convey that information to the competent authorities of the host Member State.

Click here for full Document.

Click here for a “Note to the File” pertaining to the Draft Council Decision supplementing the Schengen Borders Code as regards sea border surveillance in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by FRONTEX (COM(2009)658) as amended by the Council on 25 January 2010.

1 Comment

Filed under European Union, Frontex, General, Italy, Malta, Mediterranean

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | 01 Feb 2010 · 03:33

Le Monde, Point de vue: 2010, l’année du droit à migrer ?

“En annonçant que la centaine de boat people débarqués à Bonifacio le 22 janvier bénéficierait d’un examen individuel de situation, les autorités françaises ont laissé entendre que certains pourraient se voir reconnaître le droit d’asile. Au même moment, le ministre de l’immigration proposait pourtant “le déploiement immédiat de renforts opérationnels européens sous l’égide de l’agence européenne de surveillance des frontières (Frontex)”, pour éviter “que la Corse ne devienne une destination des candidats à l’immigration comme l’île italienne de Lampedusa”.  Autrement dit, d’empêcher qu’à l’avenir, d’autres personnes fuyant les persécutions ne trouvent protection en France. … ”

Click here for full Le Monde opinion article by Emmanuel Blanchard, Olivier Clochard et Claire Rodier , membres du réseau euro-africain Migreurop et ont coordonné l’Atlas des migrants en Europe. Géographie critique des politiques migratoires, Paris, Armand Colin, 2009.

Leave a comment

Filed under Analysis, European Union, France, Mediterranean

Tagged as , , ,

by | 31 Jan 2010 · 17:29

Spanish EU Presidency seminar: Maritime Polices for a Safe Europe

The Spanish EU Presidency conducted a seminar on “Maritime Polices for a Safe Europe” which concluded on 29 January.  Participants included representatives from FRONTEX, EMSA (European Maritime Safety Agency), CFCA (Community Fisheries Control Agency), EUISS (European Union Institute for Security Studies), and the Chiefs of Naval Staff of France, Belgium, Portugal and Sweden and Admirals of the Fleet of Italy and Germany.

According to a press release, a “’reflection document’ is going to be drawn up that will be presented at the informal meeting of defence ministers planned for the end of February. The document will be structured around three central themes: the design of a common conceptual framework, information transfer and the efficient organisation of military operations.”

Click here for press release.

Click here for the Dossier de Prensa distributed by the Armada Española, Oficina de Comunicación Social de la Armada.

Leave a comment

Filed under European Union, Frontex, News, Spain

Tagged as

by | 06 Jan 2010 · 01:07

Besson appelle l’UE à accélérer le renforcement de l’agence européenne Frontex et la surveillance des frontières européennes

“Les corps de neuf migrants morts noyés en tentant de gagner la Grèce à partir de la Turquie ont été découverts depuis cinq jours au large du port grec d’Alexandroupolis….

“Alors que les frontières extérieures de l’Union Européenne sont soumises en Grèce à une pression sans précédent des filières d’immigration irrégulière, plus de la moitié des entrées illégales dans l’espace Schengen ayant été enregistrées en 2009 à la frontière turco-grecque, Eric BESSON appelle l’Union Européenne à renforcer la surveillance des frontières européennes notamment en Méditerranée.

“Eric BESSON interviendra dans les prochains jours auprès du Commissaire européen chargé de l’immigration pour demander que les décisions prises par les Chefs d’Etat et de Gouvernement européens pour le renforcement de l’agence européenne Frontex soient mises en oeuvre sans délai.

“Ces décisions, adoptées sur proposition de la France par le Conseil européen du 30 octobre 2009, portent en particulier sur :

  • L’adoption de règles d’engagement claires pour les opérations de contrôle maritimes.
  • Une coopération opérationnelle accrue entre Frontex et les pays d’origine et de transit, notamment la Libye et la Turquie.
  • La possibilité d’affréter régulièrement des vols conjoints financés par Frontex pour des opérations groupées d’éloignement au niveau européen.

“Eric BESSON demandera également que la coopération de la Turquie dans la lutte contre les filières d’immigration irrégulière soit placée au centre des relations entre l’Union Européenne et ce pays.

“Eric BESSON proposera enfin à la présidence espagnole de l’Union Européenne que la prochaine réunion des Ministres européens en charge de l’immigration, le 21 janvier à Tolède, permette de définir une feuille de route précise pour l’application des décisions du Conseil européen et les relations avec la Turquie dans le domaine de la circulation des personnes.”

Click here for full Statement.

Leave a comment

Filed under Aegean Sea, European Union, France, Frontex, Greece, Mediterranean, Statements, Turkey

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | 04 Jan 2010 · 21:41

IAI Analysis: Control of Illegal Immigration and Italian-EU Relations

An analysis by Bruno Nascimbene, with the Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), CONTROL OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND ITALIAN-EU RELATIONS:

“Controlling maritime borders and flows of illegal immigrants in the Mediterranean is an issue where sharp tensions have been evident for some months now at the national, EU and international levels. Tensions evidenced by the reactions and outcry provoked by operations involving Italian naval units which have intercepted boats carrying migrants and sent them back to their ports of departure, most notably in Libya. The migrants concerned were deemed to be illegal regardless of their possible asylum-seeker status. Such interventions have raised, and continue to raise, concerns over the fate of the persons involved, especially as regards the protection of their fundamental human rights.”

Click here for full article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Analysis, European Union, Italy, Libya, Mediterranean

Tagged as , , , ,

by | 04 Jan 2010 · 20:11

EU-Med Relations: “North Africa a Transit Region for International Migration”

An interesting post on the EU-Med Relations Blog:

“In the year 2009 the European continent saw a decrease of 17 percent in irregular border crossings from the Southern Mediterranean rim. This sharp drop of the immigration flow heading to the “privileged” shores of the European Union is caused by the EU’s border control and externalisation policy against irregular immigration. In the consequence, the northern African states and Turkey are confronted with an increasing migration pressure which their authorities are unable to cope efficiently and according to international human rights rules.”

Click here for full post.

Leave a comment

Filed under Analysis, Mediterranean

Tagged as , , ,

by | 02 Jan 2010 · 20:41

EU-Funded IOM Project in Yemen

Saba, the Yemen News Agency reported that an 18 month € 2 million EU-funded project implemented by IOM will begin this month.

“The IOM-suggested project has been designed in response to humanitarian and security challenges caused by migration into Yemen, mainly through the Gulf of Aden, directly linked to organized crime, trading in human and instability in the region and Yemen, [project manager Fawzi al-Zayood] said. The [project] outcomes are expected to include a framework for legislation and policies for migration management, training about 800 employees working at the migration authority and Border Guard and establishing a fund to provide services for trafficking-victimized migrants under the supervision of the IOM.”

Click here for article.

2 Comments

Filed under European Union, Gulf of Aden, News, Yemen

Tagged as , , , ,